Germaine v. United States of America

Filing 52

ORDER: Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 50 ) recommending that Huber + Suhner, Inc. and Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s respective Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 24 , 32 ) be granted and th e parties be dismissed from the action. No objections have been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Upon de novo review in accordance with Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recom mended disposition. (See Doc. No. 50 at 7-16.) Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED, the parties' Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 24 , 32 ) are GRANTED, and they are hereby DISMISSED from this action. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 7/1/2019 (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (jm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JOHN W. GERMAINE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 3:18-cv-00031 ORDER Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 50) recommending that Huber + Suhner, Inc. and Raymond James Financial, Inc.’s respective Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 24, 32) be granted and the parties be dismissed from the action. No objections have been filed to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. Upon de novo review in accordance with Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. (See Doc. No. 50 at 7-16.) Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED, the parties’ Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 24, 32) are GRANTED, and they are hereby DISMISSED from this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?