Bonick v. United States of America

Filing 13

ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompany Memorandum, the Court DENIES Petitioner's Motion to Vacate. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 12/18/18. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CHRISTOPHER N. BONICK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 3:18-cv-0274 JUDGE CAMPBELL ORDER Pending before the Court is a Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 To Vacate, Set Aside Or Correct Sentence (Doc. No. 1), filed by Petitioner, pro se. In response, the Government filed a Response to Motion for Relief Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. No. 10), and Petitioner filed a reply. (Doc. No. 11). For the reasons set forth in the accompany Memorandum, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Should the Petitioner give timely notice of an appeal from this Memorandum and Order, such notice shall be treated as an application for a certificate of appealability, 28 U.S.C. 2253(c), which will not issue because the Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Castro v. United States, 310 F.3d 900 (6th Cir. 2002). It is so ORDERED. ____________________________________ WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?