Plemons, Jr. v. Core Civic Administrative Headquarters et al
Filing
102
ORDER: The R&R (Doc. No. 101) is APPROVED and ADOPTED, and Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 81 & 85) are GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter a judgment in favor of Defendants and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/29/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
DAVID HOPKINS PLEMONS,
Plaintiff,
v.
CORE CIVIC ADMINISTRATIVE
HEADQUARTERS, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
) No. 3:18-cv-00498
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
In this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Magistrate Judge has issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc.
Nos. 81 & 85) be granted and that this action be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative
remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. No objections have
been filed to the R&R.
Having reviewed the matter de novo as required by Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. Accordingly, the R&R (Doc. No.
101) is APPROVED and ADOPTED, and Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos.
81 & 85) are GRANTED.
The Clerk of the Court shall enter a judgment in favor of Defendants and close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
__________________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?