Plemons, Jr. v. Core Civic Administrative Headquarters et al

Filing 102

ORDER: The R&R (Doc. No. 101) is APPROVED and ADOPTED, and Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 81 & 85) are GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter a judgment in favor of Defendants and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/29/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION DAVID HOPKINS PLEMONS, Plaintiff, v. CORE CIVIC ADMINISTRATIVE HEADQUARTERS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:18-cv-00498 ) ) ) ) ) ORDER In this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Magistrate Judge has issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 81 & 85) be granted and that this action be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. No objections have been filed to the R&R. Having reviewed the matter de novo as required by Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. Accordingly, the R&R (Doc. No. 101) is APPROVED and ADOPTED, and Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 81 & 85) are GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter a judgment in favor of Defendants and close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. __________________________________________ WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?