Williams v. Baker

Filing 28

ORDER: On June 7, 2024, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation(Doc No. 26 ), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute and that the Motion to Dismiss filed by the defendant (Doc. No. 22 ) is DENIED AS MOOT.The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Rule 58, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 07/03/24. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (ad)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION KENNARD C. WILLIAMS, JR., Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM BAKER, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 3:22-cv-713 Judge Trauger ORDER On June 7, 2024, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc No. 26), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute and that the Motion to Dismiss filed by the defendant (Doc. No. 22) is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Rule 58, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is so ORDERED. ________________________________ ALETA A. TRAUGER U.S. District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?