Jones v. Chappel et al
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation 18 and concludes that it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, this action 1 is DISMISSED without prejudice. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by Chief Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 1/6/2025. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
JUSTIN EZRA JONES,
Plaintiff,
v.
ROBIN CHAPPELL, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. 3:24-cv-00002
JUDGE CAMPBELL
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
HOLMES
ORDER
Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, which
was filed on November 22, 2024. (Doc. No. 18). In the Report and Recommendation, the
Magistrate Judge recommends this action be dismissed without prejudice because Defendants have
not been served with process within the time set out in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The
Magistrate Judge also recommends dismissal of this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
41(b) due to Plaintiff’s failure to stay engaged in this lawsuit, provide a change of address notice,
or respond to two separate Show Cause Orders. (Doc. Nos. 15, 17).
Although the Report and Recommendation advised the parties that any objections must be
filed within fourteen days of service, no objections were filed.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes that it should be
adopted and approved. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.
This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58,
and the Clerk is directed to close the file.
It is so ORDERED.
___________________________________
WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?