Outler v. Western Express, Inc.

Filing 12

ORDER: As of the entry of this Order, Defendant remains unserved. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 9) is adopted and approved, and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by Chief Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 1/27/2025. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ab)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION RAYMOND OUTLER, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. WESTERN EXPRESS, INC., Defendant. NO. 3:24-cv-00026 JUDGE CAMPBELL MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOLMES ORDER Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report (Doc. No. 9), which was filed on September 27, 2024, recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for failure to serve process. (Doc. No. 9). Plaintiff filed an objection, stating that he did not receive the Court’s Order at Docket Entry No. 8 and requesting additional time serve Defendant. (Doc. No. 10). On October 28, 2024, the Court granted Plaintiff an additional 45 days to effect service of process on Defendant and directed the Clerk to mail Plaintiff a copy of the Order at Docket Entry No. 8. (Doc. No. 11). As of the entry of this Order, Defendant remains unserved. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 9) is adopted and approved, and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the file. It is so ORDERED. ___________________________________ WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?