Harris v. Audi Nashville et al

Filing 39

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The R&R is ACCEPTED in its entirety. Audi of Nashville's Second Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint 29] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. American Credit Acceptance, LLC's Motion to Dismiss 25 i s GRANTED, and all claim against this defendant are DISMISSED. Plaintiff Clinton Harris's "Motion To Dismiss Request For Extension Of Time" 27 is DENIED. Harris's "Motion For Relief To Be Granted" 28 is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 3/6/2025. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
CLINTON HARRIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
AUDI OF NASHVILLE and
AMERICAN CREDIT ACCEPTANCE,
LLC,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:24-cv-00791
Judge Aleta A. Trauger

ORDER
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, the Objections filed by
plaintiff Clinton Harris (Doc. No. 37) and defendant Audi of Nashville (Doc. No. 36) to the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. No. 35) are both OVERRULED,
and the R&R is ACCEPTED in its entirety. Consequently, the court disposes of the pending
motions as follows:
(1) defendant Audi of Nashville’s Second Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint
(Doc. No. 29) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as untimely;
(2) defendant American Credit Acceptance, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 25) is
GRANTED, and all claim against this defendant are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim for
which relief may be granted;
(3) plaintiff Clinton Harris’s “Motion To Dismiss Request For Extension Of Time” (Doc.
No. 27) is DENIED; and
(4) Harris’s “Motion For Relief To Be Granted” (Doc. No. 28) is DENIED.

2
This case remains on referral to the Magistrate Judge.
It is so ORDERED.

ALETA A. TRAUGER
United States District Judge