Mountain Laurel Assurance Company v. Salinas et al
Filing
31
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 26 . Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen on 7/15/13. (Breen, J.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
EASTERN DIVISION
MOUNTAIN LAUREL ASSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v.
No. 1:13-cv-1059-JDB-egb
JESSE DANIEL SCOTT SALINAS, et al.,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
_____________________________________________________________________________
On May 7, 2013, the Plaintiff, Mountain Laurel Assurance Company., filed a motion for
default judgment against Defendant, Jesse Daniel Scott Salinas. (Docket Entry (“D.E.”) 20.) The
Court referred the motion to United States Magistrate Judge Edward G. Bryant for a report and
recommendation. (D.E. 21.) On June 18, 2013, Judge Bryant issued a report and recommendation
finding that the Plaintiff is “entitled to a decree that Plaintiff’s relief sought in the Complaint, as
against Salinas is granted. Salinas is not entitled to receive further notice of hearings or service of
documents in this cause, to present a defense in this cause, or otherwise to contest the issues
involved in this cause.” (D.E. 26.)
According to the Court’s docket, no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s report and
recommendation have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), and the time for filing
objections has passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). After a review of the Magistrate Judge’s report and
recommendation, the Court ADOPTS Judge Bryant’s findings and recommendations, and the motion
for default judgment against Defendant, Salinas, is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of July, 2013.
s/ J. DANIEL BREEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?