Bayader Fooder Trading, LLC v. Wright et al
Filing
61
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Signed by Chief Judge J. Daniel Breen on 5/13/16. (Breen, J.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
EASTERN DIVISION
BAYADER FOODER TRADING, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
No. 13-2856
GREGORY L. WRIGHT and
WRIGHT FARMS 1 HAYMAKERS, INC.,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________________
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
_____________________________________________________________________________
According to the docket in this matter, the Plaintiff, Bayader Fooder Trading, LLC, sought
and obtained entry of default against the Defendants, Gregory L. Wright and Wright Farms 1
Haymakers, Inc., issued by the Clerk of Court on September 2, 2015. (D.E. 56.) On September
21, 2015, the individual Defendant made a filing construed by the Court as a motion to set aside the
Clerk’s entry of default (D.E. 57), which was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge (D.E.
58).
On March 7, 2016, the magistrate judge entered a report and recommendation
recommending that the motion be denied.
(D.E. 59.)
No objections to the report and
recommendation were filed and, in an order entered April 4, 2016, this Court adopted the report
and denied the motion to set aside the entry of default. (D.E. 60.) The docket reflects no
additional filings since that date.
Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[w]hen a party against
whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that
failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party’s default.” Fed. R. Civ.
1
P. 55(a). Entry of default under subparagraph (a) is, however, merely the first step on the way to
default judgment. Devlin v. Kalm, 493 F. App’x 678, 685-86 (6th Cir. 2012). Default judgment
is provided for under Rule 55(b), which states that
[i]f the plaintiff's claim is for a sum certain or a sum that can be made certain by
computation, the clerk -- on the plaintiff's request, with an affidavit showing the
amount due -- must enter judgment for that amount and costs against a defendant
who has been defaulted for not appearing and who is neither a minor nor an
incompetent person.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(1). In all other cases, "the party must apply to the court for a default
judgment." Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2).
Here, the Clerk has entered default under subsection (a). In order to obtain default
judgment, the Plaintiff must move therefor subsequent to the entry of default. As it has to date
failed to do so, the Plaintiff is hereby directed to show cause, within eleven (11) days of the entry
of this order, why its claims against the Defendants should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute
in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. In responding to this show cause order, the Plaintiff must
inform the Court of the reasons for its failure to seek default judgment. Failure to respond
sufficiently and in a timely manner to the Court's order may result in dismissal of its claims.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of May 2016.
s/ J. DANIEL BREEN
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?