Transou v. Harris

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen on 1/10/18. (mbm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION KEITH TRANSOU, Plaintiff, v. No. 1:16-cv-01065-JDB-egb ANITA HARRIS, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE _____________________________________________________________________________ On April 4, 2016, the pro se Defendant, Anita Harris, filed a notice of removal to this Court of a matter before the Juvenile Court of Madison County, Tennessee. (Docket Entry ("D.E.") 1.) In her filing, she alleged racial discrimination on the part of the juvenile court judge, Christy R. Little, who presided over a child custody dispute involving Harris and Keith Transou, the father of the children at issue and the party to whom custody of the children was apparently awarded. Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 2013-05, this action was referred to the assigned magistrate judge, Edward G. Bryant, for management of all pretrial matters, including screening of the removal documents. In a report and recommendation entered October 18, 2017, Judge Bryant recommended that the case be dismissed sua sponte in accordance with Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (D.E. 7.) No objection to the report and recommendation has been filed, and the time for such objection has expired. Having reviewed the report and recommendation and the entire record, the Court hereby ADOPTS the report and DISMISSES this matter in its entirety. IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of January 2018. s/ J. DANIEL BREEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?