Crutchfield v. United States of America

Filing 9

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, AND CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen on 9/25/17. (mbm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION DALTON ERIC CRUTCHFIELD, Petitioner, v. No. 1:16-cv-01167-JDB-egb No. 1:11-cr-10010-JDB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ____________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, AND CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ____________________________________________________________________________ A motion to vacate, set aside, and correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was filed by the Petitioner, Dalton Eric Crutchfield, on June 17, 2016 (“Petition”).1 (Case Number (“No.”) 1:16-cv-01167-JDB-egb, Docket Entry (“D.E.”) 1.) On September 1, 2017, the United States Probation Office issued a memorandum addressing, among other things, the impact of the recent decision of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. Stitt, 860 F.3d 854 (6th Cir. 2017), on this case. On September 14, 2017, the Court directed the Government to respond to the Petition in light of Stitt. (Id., D.E. 7.) The Government responded the following day, conceding that, in light of the decision, the relief sought by Crutchfield was warranted. (Id., D.E. 8.) For good cause shown, the Petition is GRANTED. Further, the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter an order of production of the Petition and set a resentencing hearing. 1 This filing was made by the Assistant Federal Defender on Petitioner's behalf. A second petition was filed by Crutchfield pro se on June 27, 2016. (D.E. 5.) 1 IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of September 2017. s/ J. DANIEL BREEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?