Wynn v. Lexington Tennessee City Police Department et al

Filing 12

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE. Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 3/21/17. (Todd, James)

Download PDF
United States District Court WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE JAMES J. WYNN, Plaintiff, CASE NUMBER: 16-1196-JDT-cgc CITY OF LEXINGTON and THE STATE OF TENNESSEE, Defendants, Decision by Court. This action came to consideration before the Court. The issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that in compliance with the order entered in the above-styled matter on 3/21/2017, the Court DISMISSES Wynn’s complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b(1). Leave to amend is DENIED. Wynn’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 3) is DENIED as moot. It is also CERTIFIED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3), that any appeal in this matter by Plaintiff would not be taken in good faith. The Plaintiff is instructed that if he wishes to take advantage of the installment procedures for paying the appellate filing fee, he must comply with the procedures set out in McGore and § 1915(a)(2) by filing an updated in forma pauperis affidavit and a current, certified copy of his inmate trust account for the six months immediately preceding the filing of the notice of appeal. For analysis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) of future filings, if any, by Plaintiff, this is the third dismissal of one of his cases as frivolous or for failure to state a claim. This “strike” shall take effect when judgment is entered. Coleman v. Tollefson, 135 S. Ct. 1759, 1763-64 (2015). Plaintiff is warned that he will be barred from filing any further actions in forma pauperis while he is a prisoner within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(h) unless he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. APPROVED: s/James D. Todd JAMES D. TODD U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE THOMAS M. GOULD CLERK BY: s/Blair Moore DEPUTY CLERK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?