Rankin v. Jackson Madison General Hospital

Filing 15

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 2/16/18. (mbm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION ______________________________________________________________________________ DENICIA RANKIN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 17-1050-STA-egb ) JACKSON MADISON ) COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL, ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS ______________________________________________________________________________ Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge’ Report and Recommendation that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11) be denied. The Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation on February 1, 2018. Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due within fourteen (14) days of the entry of the Report, making the objections due no later than February 15, 2018. To date neither party has filed any objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report. Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation de novo and the entire record, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Plaintiff is granted an additional forty-five (45) days from the entry of this order in which to effectuate proper service on Defendant. Plaintiff is required to file an amended complaint to correct the naming error in the complaint during the forty-five (45) days to effectuate service. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ S. Thomas Anderson S. THOMAS ANDERSON CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Date: February 16, 2018 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?