Rankin v. Jackson Madison General Hospital
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 2/16/18. (mbm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
EASTERN DIVISION
______________________________________________________________________________
DENICIA RANKIN,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
No. 17-1050-STA-egb
)
JACKSON MADISON
)
COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL,
)
)
Defendant.
)
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
AND
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
______________________________________________________________________________
Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge’ Report and Recommendation that
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11) be denied. The Magistrate Judge submitted his
Report and Recommendation on February 1, 2018.
Objections to the Report and
Recommendation were due within fourteen (14) days of the entry of the Report, making the
objections due no later than February 15, 2018. To date neither party has filed any objections to
the Magistrate Judge’s Report.
Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation de novo and the
entire record, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report.
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is
DENIED. Plaintiff is granted an additional forty-five (45) days from the entry of this order in
which to effectuate proper service on Defendant. Plaintiff is required to file an amended
complaint to correct the naming error in the complaint during the forty-five (45) days to
effectuate service.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ S. Thomas Anderson
S. THOMAS ANDERSON
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Date: February 16, 2018
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?