Jenkins v. Deitz et al
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1)-(2) OR PAY $400 CIVIL FILING FEE. Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 4/13/18. (mbm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
MICHAEL RAY JENKINS,
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1)-(2) OR PAY $400 CIVIL FILING FEE
On May 24, 2017, Plaintiff Michael Ray Jenkins, Tennessee Department of Correction
prisoner number 89343, who is incarcerated at the Whiteville Correctional Facility in
Whiteville, Tennessee, filed a pro se complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the U.S.
District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff’s non-medical
claims against Defendant Tamra Ford were severed and transferred to this district on June
8, 2017. (ECF No. 5.)
Plaintiff did not pay the civil filing fee when he submitted his complaint. Under the
Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)-(b), a prisoner bringing a civil
action must pay the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).1 Although the obligation to
The civil filing fee is $350. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The Schedule of Fees set out
following the statute also requires the Clerk to collect an additional administrative fee of $50 for
filing any civil case. However, that additional $50 fee will not apply if Plaintiff is ultimately
granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
pay the fee accrues at the moment the case is filed, see McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d
601, 605 (6th Cir. 1997), partially overruled on other grounds by LaFountain v. Harry, 716
F.3d 944, 951 (6th Cir. 2013), the PLRA provides the prisoner the opportunity to make a
“down payment” of a partial filing fee and pay the remainder in installments. Id. at 604.
However, in order to take advantage of the installment procedures, the prisoner must
complete and submit to the district court, along with the complaint, an in forma pauperis
affidavit and a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the last six months.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). In this case, although Plaintiff did submit a certified copy of his trust
account statement (ECF No. 2), he did not file an actual in forma pauperis affidavit.
Therefore, the Plaintiff is ORDERED to submit, within 30 days after the date of this
order, either the entire $400 civil filing fee or a properly completed and executed application
to proceed in forma pauperis.2 The Clerk is directed to mail Plaintiff a copy of the prisoner
in forma pauperis affidavit form along with this order. If Plaintiff needs additional time to
submit the affidavit, he may, within 30 days after the date of this order, file a motion for an
extension of time.
If Plaintiff timely submits the necessary document and the Court finds that he is
indeed indigent, the Court will grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and assess only a
$350 filing fee in accordance with the installment procedures of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b).
However, if Plaintiff fails to comply with this order in a timely manner the Court will deny
Plaintiff does not need to submit another copy of his trust account statement.
leave to proceed in forma pauperis, assess the entire $400 filing fee from his inmate trust
account without regard to the installment payment procedures, and dismiss the action without
further notice for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). McGore, 114 F.3d
If Plaintiff is transferred to a different prison or released, he is ORDERED to notify
the Court immediately, in writing, of his change of address. Failure to abide by this
requirement may likewise result in the dismissal of this case without further notice, for
failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ James D. Todd
JAMES D. TODD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Even a voluntary dismissal by Plaintiff will not eliminate the obligation to pay the filing
fee. McGore. 114 F.3d at 607; see also In re Alea, 286 F.3d 378, 381 (6th Cir. 2002).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?