Iron Horse Energy Services, Inc. v. Southern Concrete Products, Inc.
Filing
64
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT'S ( 38 ) MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT, PLAINTIFF'S ( 44 ) MOTION TO DENY OR STRIKE MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT, Motion to Strike ; AND PLAINTIFF'S ( 55 ) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO REPLY. Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen on 9/23/19. (cdi)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
EASTERN DIVISION
IRON HORSE ENERGY SERVICES, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
SOUTHERN CONCRETE PRODUCTS, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:18-cv-02554-JDB-jay
_____________________________________________________________________________________
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT,
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DENY OR STRIKE MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT, AND
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO REPLY
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Pending on the Court’s docket are the Defendant’s August 8, 2019, motion to dismiss the complaint
(Docket Entry (“D.E.”) 38), the Plaintiff’s August 29, 2019, motion to deny or strike the motion to dismiss
the complaint (D.E. 44), and the Plaintiff’s September 12, 2019, motion for leave to reply (D.E. 55). On
September 20, 2019, the Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. (D.E. 63.) As “[a]n amended complaint
supersedes an earlier complaint for all purposes,” In re Refrigerant Compressors Antitrust Litig., 731 F.3d
586, 589 (6th Cir. 2013), the enumerated motions are now moot and are DENIED on that basis.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of September 2019.
s/ J. DANIEL BREEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?