Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. v. O'Bryant
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DISMISSING CASE, AND TERMINATING ALL PENDING MOTIONS. Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen on 7/10/19. (skc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
EASTERN DIVISION
SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT
SERVICES, INC.,
Petitioner,
v.
No. 1:19-mc-00001-JDB
TOMMY O’BRYANT,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION,
DISMISSING CASE, AND TERMINATING ALL PENDING MOTIONS
______________________________________________________________________________
On January 18, 2019, Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. (“Sedgwick”), filed a
motion to quash a subpoena issued by Tommy O’Bryant in connection with a civil action pending
before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, docket number
1:18-cv-00008-LG-JCG. (Docket Entry (“D.E.”) 1.) This Court initially referred the matter to
United States Magistrate Judge Jon A. York on January 23, 2019. (D.E. 6.) Sedgwick then filed
a motion to dismiss its motion to quash on June 4, 2019, as the underlying case in the Southern
District of Mississippi had been dismissed upon a motion for summary judgment. (D.E. 17.) The
Court referred the motion to dismiss to Magistrate Judge York for a report and recommendation,
(D.E. 18), which he submitted on June 18, 2019, recommending that the matter be dismissed.
(D.E. 19.) Neither party objected to the report, and the time to do so has expired. Therefore, upon
review of the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the Court ADOPTS Judge York’s
report and recommendation. The motion to quash is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and
all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of July, 2019.
s/ J. DANIEL BREEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?