Curran, III v. Fronabarger et al

Filing 105

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE 95 97 98 99 100 103 . Signed by Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 3/5/25. (skc)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
EASTERN DIVISION
JOHN F. CURRAN, III,
Plaintiff,
vs.

No. 23-1064-STA-jay

CARL A. FRONABARGER,
Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
that Plaintiff’s Motion to Set Aside Orders (ECF No. 95), Motion to Amend Reply Brief (ECF
No. 98), and Motion for Evidentiary Hearing (ECF No. 99) be denied. Plaintiff has filed
objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report. (ECF No. 103.) Defendant has not filed a response
to the objections. Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the entire record
of the proceedings, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge correctly set forth the applicable
law and cogently applied it to the disputed issues; thus, his decision was not “clearly erroneous
or contrary to law.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). The Court hereby
ADOPTS it in its entirety, and the motions set forth above are DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ S. Thomas Anderson
S. THOMAS ANDERSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Date: March 5, 2025