Hogrobrooks v. Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation et al

Filing 20

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 18 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Bernice B. Donald on 9/25/2008. (Donald, Bernice)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION ) HEATHER PATRICE HOGROBROOKS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) CASE NO. 07-2178 ) TEXAS GUARANTEED STUDENT LOAN ) CORPORATION and EDUCATIONAL ) CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, ) ) Appellees. ) ) ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the United States Magistrate Judge on Appellant Heather Patrice Hogrobrooks's ("Appellant") appeal from the decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court denying her motion for relief pursuant to Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (D.E. #18.) The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Bankruptcy Court's judgment of December 6, 2006 be affirmed. The Magistrate Judge issued his R&R on September 3, 2008. On September 9, 2008, Appellant e-mailed the Magistrate Judge's law clerk (and apparently opposing counsel as well) a list of several objections to the R&R. It seems that on that same date Appellant also formally filed objections with the Court. (D.E. #19.) These formal objections differ in substance from Appellant's e-mail. Regardless of which set of objections is considered, however, Appellant's arguments are without merit. The Court has reviewed the record before it and the Magistrate Judge's R&R, which accurately states the law applicable to this case. Accordingly, the Court fully adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as its findings, and for the reasons contained therein, the Court AFFIRMS the judgment of the United States Bankruptcy Court. IT IS SO ORDERED this the 25th day of September 2008. s/Bernice Bouie Donald BERNICE BOUIE DONALD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?