ADT Services AG et al v. Brady et al

Filing 169

ORDER denying without prejudice 107 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 109 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 111 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 112 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 114 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 115 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 118 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 120 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 122 Motion in Limine; Defendants to submit a pleading responding to the amended complaint by 2/28/2013 and Discovery cutoff is 4/19/2013. Signed by U.S. District Judge Robert H. Cleland on 2/8/2013. (lgw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION ADT SERVICES, AG, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 10-2197 v. THOMAS BRADY, et al., Defendants. / ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PENDING MOTIONS AND SETTING SCHEDULE As agreed by the parties and the court during a January 31, 2013, telephone conference, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Dkt. # 81] and Defendants’ motions in limine [Dkts. # 107, 109, 111, 112, 114, 115, 118, 120, 122] are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by February 18, 2013, Defendants will submit a pleading responding to the amended complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties have until April 19, 2013, to complete discovery. On April 19 the parties shall contact the court to arrange a status conference. s/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: February 8, 2013 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, February 8, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Lisa Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (313) 234-5522 S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C2 ORDERS\10-2197TN.ADT.Schedule.ckb.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?