ADT Services AG et al v. Brady et al

Filing 238

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Signed by U.S. District Judge Robert H. Cleland on 9/8/14. (lgw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION ADT LLC, and ADT US HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiffs, Case No. 10-2197 v. TOM BRADY, et al., Defendants. / ORDER OF DISMISSAL This case is currently set for trial beginning September 15, 2014. However, on September 7, 2014, the parties informed the court that they have reached a settlement which resolves all of Plaintiffs’ pending claims. It thus appears that further court involvement is unnecessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Nothing in this order shall be deemed to adversely affect or in any way impact the parties’ rights. Either party may reopen this case by September 30, 2014, by filing a “Notice of Reopening.” The parties may also submit their own substitute stipulated order of dismissal or judgment by September 30, 2014. After September 30, 2014, in the absence of any further order of the court or filing by the parties, this dismissal will be with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ pending motions in limine (Dkt. ## 226, 227) are DENIED AS MOOT. s/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: September 8, 2014 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, September 8, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Lisa Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (313) 234-5522 S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C2 ORDERS\10-2197.ADT.OrderConditionalDismissal.jac.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?