Shelby County Board Of Education v. Memphis City Board of Education et al

Filing 293

ORDER granting 292 Motion to Intervene. Signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr on 07/09/2012.

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE, et al., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff/CounterDefendant, v. MEMPHIS CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. ROBERT E. COOPER, JR., et al., Third-Party Defendants. No. 11-2101 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO INTERVENE Before the Court Collierville, City (collectively, the of is the City Bartlett, “Municipalities”) of and July Germantown, City 9, of 2012 Town of Lakeland’s motion to intervene under Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (the “Motion”). (See ECF No. 292; see also Mem. in Supp. of 1 Mot. to Intervene, ECF No. 292-1.) On July 5, 2012, the Court granted Third-Party Plaintiff the Board of County Commissioners of Shelby County, Tennessee’s (the “Commissioners”) motion for leave to file a third-party complaint. (See ECF No. 290.) The Municipalities seek to intervene to protect their interests in referenda elections scheduled for August 2, 2012. The referenda elections address the creation of municipal school districts. The Municipalities argue that they “have a substantial legal interest in the outcome of the case and their interests may be irrevocably impaired” if they are not permitted to intervene. (Mem. in Supp. 3.) For GRANTED. good cause shown, the Municipalities’ Motion is The Municipalities are permitted to intervene in the above-captioned matter and to file their response to the Commissioners’ request for injunctive relief. So ordered this 9th day of July, 2012. s/ Samuel H. Mays, Jr._______ SAMUEL H. MAYS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?