Shelby County Board Of Education v. Memphis City Board of Education et al
Filing
293
ORDER granting 292 Motion to Intervene. Signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr on 07/09/2012.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
WESTERN DIVISION
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SHELBY
COUNTY, TENNESSEE, et al.,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff/CounterDefendant,
v.
MEMPHIS CITY BOARD OF
EDUCATION, et al.,
Defendants.
THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF SHELBY
COUNTY, TENNESSEE,
Third-Party Plaintiff,
v.
ROBERT E. COOPER, JR., et al.,
Third-Party Defendants.
No. 11-2101
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO INTERVENE
Before
the
Court
Collierville,
City
(collectively,
the
of
is
the
City
Bartlett,
“Municipalities”)
of
and
July
Germantown,
City
9,
of
2012
Town
of
Lakeland’s
motion
to
intervene under Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
(the “Motion”).
(See ECF No. 292; see also Mem. in Supp. of
1
Mot. to Intervene, ECF No. 292-1.)
On July 5, 2012, the Court
granted Third-Party Plaintiff the Board of County Commissioners
of Shelby County, Tennessee’s (the “Commissioners”) motion for
leave to file a third-party complaint.
(See ECF No. 290.)
The
Municipalities seek to intervene to protect their interests in
referenda elections scheduled for August 2, 2012.
The referenda
elections address the creation of municipal school districts.
The Municipalities argue that they “have a substantial legal
interest in the outcome of the case and their interests may be
irrevocably impaired” if they are not permitted to intervene.
(Mem. in Supp. 3.)
For
GRANTED.
good
cause
shown,
the
Municipalities’
Motion
is
The Municipalities are permitted to intervene in the
above-captioned
matter
and
to
file
their
response
to
the
Commissioners’ request for injunctive relief.
So ordered this 9th day of July, 2012.
s/ Samuel H. Mays, Jr._______
SAMUEL H. MAYS, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?