AREVALO et al v. MARTINEZ et al

Filing 71

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 70 Report and Recommendations and denying 21 Motion to Dismis.. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Tarnow on 07/02/2013. (Tarnow, Arthur)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MEMPHIS DIVISION NUVIA AREVALO, ET AL., Plaintiffs, Case No. 11-2339 v. SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ARTHUR J. TARNOW UMH PROPERTIES, INC., ET AL., MAGISTRATE JUDGE TU M. PHAM Defendants. / ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [70]; AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [21] WITHOUT PREJUDICE Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [21], filed on September 19, 2011. One June 25, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation [70] recommending that the Court deny Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [21] without prejudice and allow non-arbitrating Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint. The parties have not filed any objections the Report and Recommendation [70]. The Court has reviewed the record in this case. The Report and Recommendation [70] of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and is entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [21] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that non-arbitrating Plaintiffs file an amended complaint in accordance with the Report and Recommendation [70]. SO ORDERED. s/Arthur J. Tarnow ARTHUR J. TARNOW SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: July 2, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?