American Federation of State, County, Municipal Employees Local 1733 et al v. City of Memphis
Filing
60
ORDER denying as moot 19 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr on 03/28/2012.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
WESTERN DIVISION
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE,
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES
LOCAL 1733, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF MEMPHIS,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 11-2577
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT
In this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Plaintiffs allege
that Defendant City of Memphis (the “City”) has violated their
First
and
Fourteenth
Amendment
rights
injunctive, and declaratory relief.
and
seek
monetary,
(See Compl. for Damages,
Declaratory J., and Injunctive Relief ¶¶ 4-17, 42-55, ECF No.
1.)
(“Compl.”)
On August 8, 2011 the City filed a Motion for Judgment on
the
Pleadings
or,
in
the
Failure to State a Claim.
alternative,
Motion
to
Dismiss
for
(See ECF No. 19) (the “Motion to
Dismiss.”)
On January 26, 2012, Plaintiffs amended their Complaint.
(See ECF No. 50) (the “Amended Complaint.”)
1
On March 26, 2012,
Plaintiffs were granted leave to file a Supplemental Amended
Complaint under Rule 15(d).
(See ECF No. 58) (the “Supplemental
Amended Complaint.”)
Because the Complaint has been amended twice, Defendant’s
Motion to Dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT, without prejudice to its
right to renew the arguments in its Motion in response to the
Supplemental Amended Complaint.
So ordered this 28th day of March, 2012.
s/ Samuel H. Mays, Jr._______
SAMUEL H. MAYS, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?