American Federation of State, County, Municipal Employees Local 1733 et al v. City of Memphis

Filing 60

ORDER denying as moot 19 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr on 03/28/2012.

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES LOCAL 1733, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF MEMPHIS, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 11-2577 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT In this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Plaintiffs allege that Defendant City of Memphis (the “City”) has violated their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights injunctive, and declaratory relief. and seek monetary, (See Compl. for Damages, Declaratory J., and Injunctive Relief ¶¶ 4-17, 42-55, ECF No. 1.) (“Compl.”) On August 8, 2011 the City filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or, in the Failure to State a Claim. alternative, Motion to Dismiss for (See ECF No. 19) (the “Motion to Dismiss.”) On January 26, 2012, Plaintiffs amended their Complaint. (See ECF No. 50) (the “Amended Complaint.”) 1 On March 26, 2012, Plaintiffs were granted leave to file a Supplemental Amended Complaint under Rule 15(d). (See ECF No. 58) (the “Supplemental Amended Complaint.”) Because the Complaint has been amended twice, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT, without prejudice to its right to renew the arguments in its Motion in response to the Supplemental Amended Complaint. So ordered this 28th day of March, 2012. s/ Samuel H. Mays, Jr._______ SAMUEL H. MAYS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?