McGhee v. United States of America
Filing
6
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 5 . Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 5/8/13. (Todd, James)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
WALTER McGHEE, II,
Plaintiff,
VS.
COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 12-2789-JDT-tmp
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On April 19, 2013, Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham submitted a report and
recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) which provides that, in a case in which in
forma pauperis status has been granted, the court is to sua sponte dismiss that case, in whole
or in part, before service on the defendants if it determines that the action is frivolous or
malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or seeks monetary relief
against a defendant who is immune from such relief. In the present case, Magistrate Judge
Pham has recommended that any claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 be dismissed and
that the remaining claim be construed as one under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review
of an adverse decision by the Commissioner of Social Security.
Plaintiff has failed to file any objections to the report and recommendation.
Consequently, the report and recommendation is hereby ADOPTED in its entirety. The clerk
of the court is DIRECTED to amend the docket sheet to show that the proper defendant in
this matter is the Commissioner of Social Security and the claim is one under 42 U.S.C. §
405(g). Additionally, the clerk is DIRECTED to issue process in accordance with the
requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i) and deliver it to the United States Marshal for proper
service. All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States.
The order referring the management of this case to Magistrate Judge Pham on March
27, 2013, is hereby WITHDRAWN.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ James D. Todd
JAMES D. TODD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?