Williams v. Youth Villages et al
Filing
6
ORDER to Issue and Effect Service of Process. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton on 9/25/2013. (Claxton, Charmiane)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
WESTERN DIVISION
BRENDA C. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case 2:12-cv-02933
YOUTH VILLAGES, DOUGLASS
WALKER, GIGI (GAIL) FRANKLIN,
REBECCA HANCOCK, and LATONYA
PENDLETON,
Defendant.
ORDER TO ISSUE AND EFFECT SERVICE OF PROCESS
On October 24, 2012, Plaintiff Brenda C. Williams, a resident of Memphis, Tennessee, filed
a pro se complaint pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq.
(Docket Entry “D.E.” #1), along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (D.E. #2). On October
25, 2012, the District Court granted the motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall
record the defendants as Youth Villages, Douglass Walker, Gigi (Gail) Franklin, Rebecca Hancock,
and Latonya Pendleton.
It is ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process for Defendant and deliver that process to
the marshal for service. Process shall include a copy of Plaintiff’s Complaint. Service shall be made
on Defendant Youth Villages pursuant to Rule 4(h)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and
upon the individual defendants pursuant to Rule 4(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All
costs of service shall be advanced by the United States.
1
It is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall make a certificate of service on every document filed.
Plaintiff shall familiarize herself with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this
Court.
Plaintiff shall promptly notify the Clerk of any change of address or whereabouts. Failure
to comply with these requirements, or any other order of the Court, may result in this case being
dismissed without further notice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of September, 2013.
s/ Charmiane G. Claxton
CHARMIANE G. CLAXTON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?