Jackson v. United States et al

Filing 4

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 9/20/2013. (Anderson, S.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION ______________________________________________________________________________ RONNIE JACKSON, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) No. 2:13-cv-2588-STA-dkv ) UNITED STATES, ET AL., ) ) Respondents. ) ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER OF DISMISSAL ______________________________________________________________________________ On July 30, 2013, Petitioner Ronnie Jackson, Bureau of Prisons registration number 25343-076, an inmate at the Obion County Jail in Union City, Tennessee filed a pro se petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Docket Entry 1.) However, Petitioner neglected to pay the fee required for filing of the habeas petition ($5.00) or submit a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis which includes a certification by the prison trust fund account officer and a copy of the inmate trust fund account statement for the last six months, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). The Court issued an order on August 1, 2013, directing petitioner to pay the $5.00 habeas filing fee within thirty (30) days. The order further provided that “[f]ailure to comply in a timely manner will result in dismissal of this action without further notice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b), for failure to prosecute (D.E. 2). On September 3, 2013, Petitioner filed a letter “to inform the Court that the habeas corpus filed on 7-30-13 case no: 13-cv-2588 was not intended for the district court and was sent to it by error.” Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES the petition without prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b), for failure to prosecute. IT IT SO ORDERED this 20th day of September, 2013. s/ S. Thomas Anderson S. THOMAS ANDERSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?