Howard v ITT Federal Services International Corporation

Filing 34

ORDER denying 30 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; adopting Report and Recommendations 32 . Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 12/22/2014. (Lipman, Sheryl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION EBONY P. HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. ITT FEDERAL SERVICES INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:13-cv-02851-SHL-tmp ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis. (ECF No. 32.) In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 30) be denied because an appeal would not be taken in good faith. Plaintiff did not file objections to the Report and Recommendation within the time required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2). “When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee notes. On clear-error review of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 32) in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 30) is DENIED and Howard must pay the full appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and supporting affidavit in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals within thirty days from the date this order is entered. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 22nd day of December, 2014. /s/ Sheryl H. Lipman SHERYL H. LIPMAN U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?