Williams v. Fayette Co. Board of Education

Filing 32

ORDER GRANTING MOTION 25 TO REOPEN CASE AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 30 . Signed by Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 11/25/2015. (Anderson, S.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION HATTIE WILLIAMS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. FAYETTE COUNTY BOARD, Defendant. No. 2:14-cv-01274-STA-dkv ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ______________________________________________________________________________ Defendant filed a Motion to Reopen Case (ECF No. 25) on September 17, 2015. The motion was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for a hearing and a report and recommendation on September 24, 2015. (ECF No. 27.) Chief Magistrate Judge Diane K. Vescovo issued her report on October 9, 2015, recommending that the motion be granted and that the case be referred to Joe G. Riley for further mediation. (ECF No. 30.) Plaintiff has filed objections. (ECF No. 31.) Having reviewed the record, the controlling case law, and Plaintiff’s objections, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge’s decision and ADOPTS the report and recommendation. Defendant’s Motion to Reopen Case is GRANTED. The parties are hereby ordered to engage in mediation with Joe G. Riley no later than January 25, 2016. Within seven days of completion of the mediation, the parties shall file a notice confirming that the mediation was conducted and indicating whether it was successful or unsuccessful, without disclosing the parties’ respective 1 positions at the mediation. If the mediation is unsuccessful, an evidentiary hearing will be held by the Magistrate Judge to resolve any factual disputes as to the terms of the Settlement Agreement. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ S. Thomas Anderson S. THOMAS ANDERSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Date: November 25, 2015 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?