Lacey v. Wells Fargo, N.A. et al

Filing 36

ORDER adopting 35 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 12/22/2014. (Lipman, Sheryl)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
WESTERN DIVISION
GOLDIE LEE LACEY, and
DIANNE LACEY
Plaintiffs,
v.
WELLS FARGO, N.A., and
WILSON & ASSOCIATES, P.L.L.C.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 2:14-cv-02091-SHL-tmp

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s “Report and Recommendation” (the “Report
and Recommendation”), which was filed on November 20, 2014. (See ECF No. 35.) In the
Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiffs’ complaint be
dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), “[w]ithin 14 days after being
served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific written
objections to the proposed findings and recommendations.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). No
objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed, and the time for filing objections
has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2), 6(d), 72(b)(2).
“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear
error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)
advisory committee notes. On clear-error review of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 35) in
its entirety.

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 22nd day of December, 2014.
/s/ Sheryl H. Lipman
SHERYL H. LIPMAN
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

2