Lee v. General Sessions Court for Shelby County, Tennessee et al

Filing 8

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations and dismissing Complaint. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 06/23/2014. (Lipman, Sheryl)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
WESTERN DIVISION
TERRY MICHAEL LEE,
Plaintiff,
v.
GENERAL SESSIONS COURT FOR
SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE, et
al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 2:14-cv-02274-SHL-dkv

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On May 28, 2014, Magistrate Diane K. Vescovo issued a
“Report and Recommendation for Sua Sponte Dismissal for Lack of
Subject Matter Jurisdiction” (the “Report and Recommendation”).
(See ECF No. 6.)

In the Report and Recommendation, Judge

Vescovo recommends that Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) be
dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
6 at 10.)

(See ECF No.

The copy of the report mailed to the plaintiff at the

address provided to the Court was returned as undeliverable.
updated address information has been provided to the Court.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2),
“[w]ithin 14 days after being served with a copy of the
recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific
written objections to the proposed findings and
recommendations.”

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2).

No

The plaintiff has not informed the Court of his whereabouts
and the time period for filing objections has elapsed.

“When no

timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself
that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order
to accept the recommendation.”
committee notes.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory

On clear-error review of the Magistrate

Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Court hereby ADOPTS the
Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 6) in its entirety.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 23rd day of June, 2014.
/s/ Sheryl H. Lipman
SHERYL H. LIPMAN
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

2