Reed v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee et al
Filing
129
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 116 . Signed by Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 7/11/2016. (Anderson, S.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
WESTERN DIVISION
DETRIA C. REED,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
JESSE SANDLIN, individually and as an officer )
of the Memphis Police Department; JAMES
)
KIRKWOOD, individually and as a Colonel
)
of the Memphis Police Department; ANTHONY )
MULLINS, individually and as a Lieutenant of )
the Memphis Police Department; PRESTON
)
MORTON, individually and as a Lieutenant
)
of the Memphis Police Department; CURTIS
)
PRICE, individually and as a Sargent of the
)
Memphis Police Department; GREGORY
)
SANDERS, individually and as a Lieutenant
)
Colonel of the Memphis Police Department;
)
FRANK. HANNAH, individually and as a
)
Sargent of the Memphis Police Department;
)
and CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE,
)
)
Defendants.
)
Civil Action Number
2:15-cv-02448-STA-tmp
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
(ECF No. 116) that Sam P. Zerilla, counsel for Defendants James Kirkwood and Preston Morton,
be ordered to pay Plaintiff attorney’s fees and costs incurred with the filing of a motion to
compel. (ECF No. 111.) The Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation on
June 21, 2016. Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due within fourteen (14)
days of the entry of the Report. To date no objections have been filed. Having reviewed the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation de novo and the entire record of the
proceedings, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report, and orders Zerilla to pay Plaintiff $1,330 in
fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ S. Thomas Anderson
S. THOMAS ANDERSON
United States District Judge
Date: July 11, 2016
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?