Reed v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee et al

Filing 129

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 116 . Signed by Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 7/11/2016. (Anderson, S.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION DETRIA C. REED, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JESSE SANDLIN, individually and as an officer ) of the Memphis Police Department; JAMES ) KIRKWOOD, individually and as a Colonel ) of the Memphis Police Department; ANTHONY ) MULLINS, individually and as a Lieutenant of ) the Memphis Police Department; PRESTON ) MORTON, individually and as a Lieutenant ) of the Memphis Police Department; CURTIS ) PRICE, individually and as a Sargent of the ) Memphis Police Department; GREGORY ) SANDERS, individually and as a Lieutenant ) Colonel of the Memphis Police Department; ) FRANK. HANNAH, individually and as a ) Sargent of the Memphis Police Department; ) and CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE, ) ) Defendants. ) Civil Action Number 2:15-cv-02448-STA-tmp JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 116) that Sam P. Zerilla, counsel for Defendants James Kirkwood and Preston Morton, be ordered to pay Plaintiff attorney’s fees and costs incurred with the filing of a motion to compel. (ECF No. 111.) The Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation on June 21, 2016. Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due within fourteen (14) days of the entry of the Report. To date no objections have been filed. Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation de novo and the entire record of the proceedings, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report, and orders Zerilla to pay Plaintiff $1,330 in fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ S. Thomas Anderson S. THOMAS ANDERSON United States District Judge Date: July 11, 2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?