Howard v. Memphis Police Dept. et al
Filing
8
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WTIH 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) OR PAY THE $400 CIVIL FILING FEE 7 . Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 1/21/16. (Todd, James)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
WESTERN DIVISION
EARL HOWARD,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
VS.
) No. 2:15-cv-2800-JDT-dkv
)
MEMPHIS POLICE DEPT., ET AL.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
________________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WTIH
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) OR PAY THE $400 CIVIL FILING FEE
_______________________________________________________________________
On December 14, 2015, the pro se prisoner Plaintiff, Earl Howard, filed a
complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
(ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) However, the affidavit submitted by Plaintiff was not accompanied by
a certification by the trust account officer and a copy of his trust account statement, as
required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Accordingly, the Court issued an order on December
15, 2015, directing Plaintiff to submit either the entire civil filing fee or an in forma
pauperis affidavit containing the necessary information. Plaintiff also was advised that
he could seek one 30-day extension of time to comply, if necessary. (Id. at 2.)
On December 31, 2015, Plaintiff submitted another in forma pauperis affidavit
that also was not accompanied by a copy of his trust account statement. (ECF No. 5.)
On January 15, 2016, the Clerk received a letter from Plaintiff that the Court treated as a
motion for extension of time to file the necessary documents. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff
states that he has asked the floor counselor, but has not yet received his trust account
information. For good cause shown, the motion for an extension of time is GRANTED.
Plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days after the date of this order, either the entire
$400 civil filing fee or a copy of his trust account statement for the last six months.1
Plaintiff is reminded that if he fails to comply with this order in a timely manner,
the Court will deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, assess the $400 filing fee without
regard to the installment payment procedure, and dismiss the action without further
notice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to prosecute. See
McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3rd 601, 605 (6th Cir. 1997), partially overruled on
other grounds by LaFountain v. Harry, 716 F.3d 944, 951 (6th Cir. 2013).
IT IS SO ORDERED
__s/James D. Todd______________
JAMES D. TODD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Plaintiff does not need to submit another in forma pauperis affidavit.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?