Myers v. Correct Care Solution et al

Filing 11

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE. Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 3/21/17. (Todd, James)

Download PDF
United States District Court WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE MARIO MARQUETTE MYERS, Plaintiff, CASE NUMBER: 16-2135-JDT-cgc CORRECT CARE SOLUTION, ET AL., Defendants, Decision by Court. This action came to consideration before the Court. The issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that in compliance with the order entered in the above-styled matter on 3/20/2017, this case is hereby DISMISSED for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b)(1). The Court also CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal in this matter by Plaintiff would not be taken in good faith. The Plaintiff is instructed that if he wishes to take advantage of the PLRA’s installment procedures for paying the appellate filing fee, he must comply with the procedures set out in McGore and § 1915(a)(2) by filing an updated in forma pauperis affidavit and a current, certified copy of his inmate trust account for the six months immediately preceding the filing of the notice of appeal. Myers is warned that he is barred from filing any further actions in forma pauperis while he is a prisoner within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(h) unless he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. Any civil action filed by Myers after the date of the judgment in this case must be accompanied by either the $400 civil filing fee or allegations sufficient to show that, at the time of filing the action, he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. APPROVED: s/James D. Todd JAMES D. TODD U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE THOMAS M. GOULD CLERK BY: s/Shurlyn Chernenko DEPUTY CLERK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?