Gamble v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 08/23/2016. (Lipman, Sheryl)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
WESTERN DIVISION
STEPHANIE GAMBLE,
Plaintiff,
v.
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION OFFICE OF FIELD
PROGRAMS, MARTIN EBEL, Director of
Field Management Programs, KATHERINE
KORES, District Director, and SYLVIA
HALL, Enforcement Supervisor,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 16-cv-2402-SHL-dkv

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“Report”) filed
on July 6, 2016. (ECF No. 5.) In her Report, the Magistrate Judge granted Plaintiff’s Motion to
Proceed In Forma Pauperis and recommended sua sponte that Plaintiff’s Pro Se Complaint
(ECF No. 1) be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim
upon which relief can be granted.
Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “[w]ithin 14 days after being served
with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific written
objections to the proposed findings and recommendations.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). No
objections to the Report have been filed, and the time for filing objections has expired. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2), 6(d), 72(b)(2).
“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear
error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)
advisory committee notes. On clear-error review of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.
Accordingly, all of Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant are DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 23rd day of August, 2016.
s/ Sheryl H. Lipman
SHERYL H. LIPMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2