Marzette v. Lincoln National Insurance Company

Filing 21

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 11 17 . Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 9/7/16. (Todd, James)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION SHELTON SHERROD MARZETTE, Plaintiff, VS. LINCOLN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 16-2498-JDT-tmp ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT The pro se Plaintiff, Shelton Sherrod Marzette, filed this civil action on June 23, 2016. (ECF No 1.) United States Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham subsequently granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 5.) Magistrate Judge Pham also issued an order on June 27, 2016, directing that process be issued and served on the Defendant, Lincoln National Life Insurance Company (“Lincoln”). On August 8, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment, contending that more than twenty-one days had passed after service of process and that Lincoln had failed to file an answer. (ECF No. 11.) Lincoln responded in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion. (ECF No. 16.) On August 19, 2016, Magistrate Judge Pham issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) in which he determined that Lincoln was not in default and recommended that Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment be denied. (ECF No. 17.) No objections to the R&R have been filed. As the Magistrate Judge noted, Lincoln was served with process on July 18, 2016. (ECF No. 16 at 1.) On August 4, 2016, Lincoln requested and was granted an extension of time, through August 22, 2016, in which to respond to the complaint. (ECF Nos. 9 & 10.) An answer was filed on August10, 2016. (ECF No. 12.) Therefore, Magistrate Judge Pham’s conclusion that Lincoln was not in default is sound, and the R&R is ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ James D. Todd JAMES D. TODD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?