Allen v. Hutchison et al
Filing
51
ORDER GRANTING 49 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT OFFICER TAKELLA GATES AND ORDER OF REFERENCE AS TO DAMAGES. Signed by Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 1/24/23. (mbm)
Case 2:17-cv-02125-STA-cgc Document 51 Filed 01/24/23 Page 1 of 3
PageID 323
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
WESTERN DIVISION
CARL ALLEN, a/k/a
ARTIE PERKINS,
Plaintiff,
VS.
OFFICER ARICA HUTCHINSON, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:17-2125-STA-cgc
)
)
)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
AGAINST DEFENDANT OFFICER TAKELLA GATES
AND
ORDER OF REFERENCE AS TO DAMAGES
Plaintiff Carl Allen has filed a motion for default judgment against Defendant Takella
Gates. (ECF No. 49.) The Clerk of the Court has entered default against Defendant Gates. (ECF
No. 50.) For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED.
Plaintiff filed his lawsuit on February 23, 2017. Defendant Gates was served with a
summons and copy of the complaint on December 2, 2020. However, she did not file an answer
or otherwise respond to the complaint. On March 18, 2020, the action was dismissed against both
Defendant Gates and Defendant Anthony Alexzander. That decision was reversed, and the matter
was remanded to the District Court by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Plaintiff now seeks a
default judgment against Defendant Gates.1
1
A third-party subpoena has been issued to the Memphis Police Department in an attempt to
locate Defendant Alexander.
Case 2:17-cv-02125-STA-cgc Document 51 Filed 01/24/23 Page 2 of 3
PageID 324
To obtain a default judgment against a party pursuant to Rule 55, there must first be an
entry of default regarding that party made by the Clerk. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), (b); Shepard
Claims Serv., Inc. v. William Darrah & Assocs., 796 F.2d 190, 193 (6th Cir. 1986) (“entry of
default is ... the first procedural step on the road to obtaining a default judgment”); Ramada
Franchise Sys., Inc. v. Baroda Enters., LLC, 220 F.R.D. 303, 305 (N.D. Ohio 2004) (“an entry of
default is a prerequisite to a default judgment,” such that “a default judgment cannot be granted
until a default is entered by the Clerk”); see also 10A Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. Miller &
Mary Kay Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2682 (4th ed.) (“[p]rior to obtaining a default
judgment under either Rule 55(b)(1) or Rule 55(b)(2), there must be an entry of default as
provided by Rule 55(a)”). Here, default has been entered against Defendant Gates.
After the Clerk has entered a default, the second step provides that default judgment
“may be entered” by either the Clerk or the Court, depending on the circumstances as outlined in
Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). Even when a defendant is technically in default, the plaintiff is not entitled
to a default judgment as a matter of right. Ganther v. Ingle, 75 F.3d 207, 212 (5th Cir. 1996).
Rather, such a determination is within the court’s discretion. Shoemake v. Mansfield City Sch.,
2015 WL 13810793, at *4 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 20, 2015)
Because Plaintiff has met the requirements for a default judgment, the Court will exercise
its discretion and grant his motion. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment solely
against Defendant Gates is GRANTED, and a default judgment will be entered against
Defendant Gates.
The matter is hereby REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for a determination as to what
damages, if any, should be awarded to Plaintiff against Defendant Gates.
2
Case 2:17-cv-02125-STA-cgc Document 51 Filed 01/24/23 Page 3 of 3
PageID 325
Any objections to the Magistrate Judge’s order shall be made within fourteen (14) days
after service of the order, setting forth particularly those portions of the order objected to and the
reasons for the objections. Failure to timely assign as error a defect in the Magistrate Judge’s
order will constitute a waiver of that objection. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ S. Thomas Anderson
S. THOMAS ANDERSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Date: January 24, 2023
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?