King v. The Asset-Bank of New York Mellon et al

Filing 8

ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; adopting 7 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 7/7/17. (Lipman, Sheryl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION GWENDOLYN H. KING, Plaintiff, v. THE ASSET-BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON for the Certificateholders of CWABS, INC., Asset Backed Certificates, Series 20015, f/k/a The Bank of New York, AGENTS BANK OF AMERICA, NA, and SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 17-cv-2402-SHL-dkv ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Chief Magistrate Judge Diane K. Vescovo’s Report and Recommendation (hereinafter, the “Report”) (ECF No. 7), filed June 22, 2017, recommending the sua sponte dismissal of Plaintiff’s Pro Se Complaint (ECF No. 1) for failure to state a claim. For the following reasons, the Court ADOPTS the Report. A magistrate judge may submit to a judge of the court proposed findings of fact and recommendations for dismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). “Within 14 days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A district court reviews de novo only those proposed findings of fact or conclusions of law to which a party specifically objects. Id.; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The deadline to object to the Report has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed any objections. The Court has reviewed the Report for clear error and finds none. Therefore, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Pro Se Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 7th day of July, 2017. s/ Sheryl H. Lipman SHERYL H. LIPMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?