King v. The Asset-Bank of New York Mellon et al

Filing 8

ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; adopting 7 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 7/7/17. (Lipman, Sheryl)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
WESTERN DIVISION
GWENDOLYN H. KING,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE ASSET-BANK OF NEW YORK
MELLON for the Certificateholders of
CWABS, INC., Asset Backed Certificates,
Series 20015, f/k/a The Bank of New York,
AGENTS BANK OF AMERICA, NA, and
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 17-cv-2402-SHL-dkv

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is Chief Magistrate Judge Diane K. Vescovo’s Report and
Recommendation (hereinafter, the “Report”) (ECF No. 7), filed June 22, 2017, recommending
the sua sponte dismissal of Plaintiff’s Pro Se Complaint (ECF No. 1) for failure to state a claim.
For the following reasons, the Court ADOPTS the Report.
A magistrate judge may submit to a judge of the court proposed findings of fact and
recommendations for dismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim. 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(B). “Within 14 days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a
party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and
recommendations.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A district court reviews de
novo only those proposed findings of fact or conclusions of law to which a party specifically
objects. Id.; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).
The deadline to object to the Report has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed any objections.
The Court has reviewed the Report for clear error and finds none. Therefore, the Court hereby
ADOPTS the Report and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Pro Se Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 7th day of July, 2017.
s/ Sheryl H. Lipman
SHERYL H. LIPMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2