Shelby v. Greystar Management Services, L.P.

Filing 30

ORDER granting 17 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 23 Motion; denying 25 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 29 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Parker on 07/27/2018. (Parker, Thomas)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
WESTERN DIVISION
EDWARD LEE SHELBY,
Plaintiff,
v.
GREYSTAR MANAGEMENT
SERVICES, L.P.,
Defendant. 

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 2:17-cv-02650-TLP-cgc

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

This action comes before the Court on Defendant’s Notice of Removal, filed on
September 6, 2017. (ECF No. 1.) Presently, before the Court is a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) issued by Magistrate Judge Charmiane Claxton. (ECF No. 29.)
The R&R recommends that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and that
Plaintiff’s Motion for summary judgment be denied. (Id. at PageID 164.)
“Within 14 days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a
party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and
recommendations.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Plaintiff did not object to the R&R, and the
time for filing objections expired on July 13, 2018. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2), 6(d), 72(b)(2).
“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no
clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Fed. R. Civ. P.

72(b) advisory committee note. After reviewing the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.
Thus, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, GRANTS Defendant’s Motion
for Summary Judgment, and DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
SO ORDERED, this 27th day of July, 2018.
s/ Thomas L. Parker
THOMAS L. PARKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2