Robinson v. EEOC

Filing 5

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 4 Report and Recommendations, Order. Signed by Judge Jon Phipps McCalla on 10/30/2017. (McCalla, Jon)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION ANTHONY ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. EEOC, WILLIS MARTIN, AUDREY BONNER, and JAN MITCHELL, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:17-cv-02674-JPM-dkv ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FOR SUA SPONTE DISMISSAL Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Diane K. Vescovo on October 10, 2017. (ECF No. 4.) In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff Anthony Robinson’s Complaint be dismissed sua sponte under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Id. at PageID 47.) “Within 14 days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for filing objections expired on October 24, 2017. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2), 6(d), 72(b)(2). 1 “When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee note. On clear-error review of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 4) in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 30th day of October, 2017. /s/ Jon P. McCalla JON P. McCALLA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?