Fischiettie v. Shelby County, Tennessee

Filing 11

ORDER denying as premature 8 Motion for Discovery. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham on June 4, 2024. (shk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION JONTAE A’RON AUSTIN FISCHIETTIE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE, ) ) Defendant. ) No. 24-cv-02353-MSN-tmp ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION AS PREMATURE Pro se Plaintiff Jontae A’ron Austin Fischiettie filed a motion requesting that the court order production of documents from Defendant Shelby County. (ECF No. 8.) However, Shelby County has not yet responded to Fischiettie’s complaint and a scheduling order has not yet been entered. Therefore, the plaintiff’s motion DENIED as premature. The defendant must first appear and respond to the complaint, a scheduling conference is held, and a scheduling order must be entered pursuant to Rule 16(b). After all of these steps have been taken, and after he attempts to obtain discovery from the defendant, may Fischiettie file a motion for discovery. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Tu M. Pham TU M. PHAM Chief United States Magistrate Judge June 4, 2024 Date

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?