Rodgers v. Rayco et al

Filing 14

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re #12 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge Jon Phipps McCalla on 1/3/2025. (ta)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
WESTERN DIVISION
PAMELA RODGERS,
Plaintiff,
v.
RAYCO, KIMCO, and TVA,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 2:24-cv-2641-JPM-tmp

______

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

______

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate
Judge Tu M. Pham, filed on November 19, 2024, (ECF No. 12), with respect to Plaintiff Pamela
Rodgers’ (“Plaintiff’s” or “Rodgers’”) pro se Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 10.)
Plaintiff filed her original Complaint against Defendants for violations of Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq., and the Age Discrimination in
Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621, et seq. (ECF No. 12 at PageID 58 (citing
ECF Nos. 1, 3).) The Court, adopting a report and recommendation from Chief Magistrate Judge
Pham, dismissed Plaintiff’s Title VII age discrimination and hostile work environment claims.
(See ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint alleges age discrimination and retaliation under
Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and the ADEA. (ECF No. 12 at PageID 58 (citing ECF No. 10).)
Chief Magistrate Judge Pham recommends the Court dismiss all claims against Defendant
Kimco and the § 1981 claims against Defendants Rayco and TVA for failure to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted. (ECF No. 12 at PageID 63.)
Because no party has filed an objection within fourteen days of Chief Magistrate Judge
Pham’s Report and Recommendation, the Court ADOPTS his recommendation. It is thus
ORDERED all claims as to Defendant Kimco and the § 1981 claims against Defendants Rayco
and TVA are DISMISSED. (See id.)
SO ORDERED, this 3rd day of January, 2025.
/s/ Jon P. McCalla

JON P. McCALLA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE