Jones, Et Al v. Halliburton Company et al

Filing 27

MOTION to deem admissions by Joseph Daigle, Jamie Leigh Jones. (Kelly, Lannie) Additional attachment(s) added on 7/9/2007 (bjc, ).

Jones, Et Al v. Halliburton Company et al

Doc. 27

Case 1:07-cv-00295-TH

Document 27

Filed 07/09/2007

Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS (B E A U M O N T DIVISION) J A M IE LEIGH JONES and JOSEPH D A IG L E P la in t if f s , § § § § v s. § § H A L L IB U R T O N COMPANY d/b/a § K B R KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT § (KBR); KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT§ S E R V IC E S , INC.; KELLOGG § B R O W N & ROOT INTERNATIONAL,§ IN C .; KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT, § LLC; KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT, § INC.; KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT, § S . de R.L.; KELLOGG BROWN & § R O O T (KBR), INC.; KBR § T E C H N I C A L SERVICES, INC.; § O V E R S E A S ADMINISTRATIVE § S E R V IC E S , LTD.; ERIC ILER, § C H A R L E S BOARTZ; SEVERAL § J O H N DOE RAPISTS, and THE § U N IT E D STATES OF AMERICA § D efen d a n ts. §

C IV IL ACTION NO. 1:07CV0295

J U R Y TRIAL DEMANDED

M O T IO N TO DEEM ADMISSIONS N O W COME, Jamie Leigh Jones and Joseph Daigle, and requests that certain Admissions be deemed by KBR Kellogg Brown & Root (KBR), Kellogg B r o w n & Root Services, for their failure to answer same in a timely manner as req u ired by federal law.

-1-

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 1:07-cv-00295-TH

Document 27

Filed 07/09/2007

Page 2 of 5

O n June 5, 2007, Plaintiffs Filed and Served 88 Requests for Admission on K B R , and informed Defendant that responses were due within 30 days of service. Today, July 9 th, 2007, is the 34 th day after the Requests for Admission were serv ed on the Defendant ­ and no Answers have been served on Plaintiff by D e f e n d a n t. No order staying discovery has ever been entered, or requested - in this forum. B ecau se the proceedings in this matter have not been stayed, and because the D e fe n d a n t has failed to timely answer requests for admission, they have been d eem ed admitted in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36(a). Plaintiffs therefore respectfully request that this Honorable Court deem the fo llo w in g requested admissions admitted for purposes of this matter in this forum: Requests Numbered 1-7; 9; 11; 13; 15 - 23; 25 ­ 88. Respectfully submitted, /s/ L. Todd Kelly L . Todd Kelly T HE KELLY LAW FIRM, P.C. T ex as Bar No. 24035049 O n e Riverway, Suite 1150 H o u sto n , Texas 77056 T el. [phone] F ax . [phone] P a u l Waldner V ICKERY, WALDNER & MALLIA, L.L.C. T ex as Bar No. 20679800
-2-

Case 1:07-cv-00295-TH

Document 27

Filed 07/09/2007

Page 3 of 5

O n e Riverway, Suite 1150 H o u sto n , Texas 77056 T el. [phone] F ax . [phone] & Stephanie M. Morris A TTORNEY AT LAW M e m b e r of D.C. and PA. Bars 1 6 6 0 L. Street, N.W., Suite 506 W ash in g to n , D.C. 20036 T el. [phone] F ax . [phone] A TTORNEYS FOR CLAIMANT C ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the following counsel of record were served with true and co rrect copies of the attached First Requests for Admission on this 9 th day of July, 2007: S h a d o w Sloan, Esq. V INSON & ELKINS, LLP F ir st City Tower 1 0 0 1 Fannin Street, Suite 2300 H o u sto n , Texas 77002-6760

/s/ L. Todd Kelly

-3-

Case 1:07-cv-00295-TH

Document 27

Filed 07/09/2007

Page 4 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS (B E A U M O N T DIVISION) J A M IE LEIGH JONES and JOSEPH D A IG L E P la in t if f s , § § § § v s. § § H A L L IB U R T O N COMPANY d/b/a § K B R KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT § (KBR); KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT§ S E R V IC E S , INC.; KELLOGG § B R O W N & ROOT INTERNATIONAL,§ IN C .; KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT, § LLC; KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT, § INC.; KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT, § S . de R.L.; KELLOGG BROWN & § R O O T (KBR), INC.; KBR § T E C H N I C A L SERVICES, INC.; § O V E R S E A S ADMINISTRATIVE § S E R V IC E S , LTD.; ERIC ILER, § C H A R L E S BOARTZ; SEVERAL § J O H N DOE RAPISTS, and THE § U N IT E D STATES OF AMERICA § D efen d a n ts. §

C IV IL ACTION NO. 1:07CV0295

J U R Y TRIAL DEMANDED

O R D E R DEEMING REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION - ADMITTED T H IS DAY CAME THE PARTIES, by Counsel, on Plaintiff's Motion to Deem A d m issio n s. This Court, having considered the Motions filed by the parties, the e v id e n c e of record, and the arguments of Counsel is of the opinion that the Plaintiff's M o tio n to Deem Admissions is meritorious, and should be granted. It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiff's Motion to Deem A d m issio n s is, in all things, GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________
-4-

Case 1:07-cv-00295-TH

Document 27

Filed 07/09/2007

Page 5 of 5

JU D G E

-5-