Conlin v. TDCJ-ID et al

Filing 64

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING 62 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING defendant's motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 9/27/10. (pkb, )

Download PDF
Conlin v. TDCJ-ID et al Doc. 64 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS JEREMY LEE CONLIN, Plaintiff, versus NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-92 MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Jeremy Lee Conlin, a prisoner confined at the Stiles Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Nathaniel Quarterman, Joe Smith, J. P. Goyton, T. Lester, and Raishell Jones. The court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends granting defendants' motion for summary judgment, and dismissing the case with prejudice. The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties. ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. A final judgment will be entered in accordance with the magistrate . judge's recommendations. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 27th day of September, 2010. ________________________________________ MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?