McDaniel v. Port Arthur Police Department et al
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judges recommendation. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 5/6/11. (pkb, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSKA MCDANIEL,
§
§
Plaintiff,
§
§
versus
§
§
PORT ARTHUR POLICE DEPARTMENT, §
et al.,
§
§
Defendants.
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-421
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff Marska McDaniel, formerly an inmate confined in the Texas Department of
Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, brought this lawsuit
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Port Arthur Police Department, Mark Blanton, and Tony
Legnon.
The court referred this matter to the Honorable Earl S. Hines, United States Magistrate
Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court.
The Magistrate Judge recommends this action be dismissed as frivolous and for failing to state a
claim upon which relief may be granted.
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available
evidence. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
were filed by the parties.
ORDER
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are
correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered
in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation.
.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 6th day of May, 2011.
________________________________________
MARCIA A. CRONE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?