Johnson v. Alford et al

Filing 11

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that this case be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 3/9/09. (mrp, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WILLIAM D. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, versus WARDEN ALFORD, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-808 MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff William D. Johnson, a prisoner confined at the LeBlanc Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Warden Alford, administrators at the LeBlanc Unit, Nathanial Quartermann, Madeline Ortiz, and unidentified defendants. The court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Earl S. Hines, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the case without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties. ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered . in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge's recommendation. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 9th day of March, 2009. ________________________________________ MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?