Baggett v. Goings et al

Filing 18

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendants' motion to dismiss be granted as plaintiff has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 9/1/10. (mrp, )

Download PDF
Baggett v. Goings et al Doc. 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS JOSHUA BAGGETT, Plaintiff, versus REGINALD GOINGS, ET AL. Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-799 MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, Joshua Baggett, an inmate currently confined at the Torres Unit in Hondo, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Reginald Goings, Brian Rodeen, Jackie Selwards and Brad Livingston. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends defendants' motion to dismiss be granted as plaintiff has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties. Dockets.Justia.com ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge's recommendation. . SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 1st day of September, 2010. ________________________________________ MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?