King v. Steven et al
MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting 60 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 63 motion for extension of time is denied. Plaintiff's 34 , 40 , 42 , and 57 motions for injunctive relief are denied. Signed by Judge Thad Heartfield on 9/21/2011. (bjc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
VERNON KING, JR.
RICH N. STEVEN, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-972
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff Vernon King, Jr., a prisoner currently confined at the Estelle Unit of the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil
rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
The court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States
Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of
this court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge. The magistrate judge recommends denying plaintiff’s motions for injunctive
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge, along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. No objections to the
Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.1
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct,
and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to
Plaintiff requested an extension of time to file objections to the report and recommendation, but he
did not state any grounds for an extension nor indicate how much additional time he wanted.
file objections (document no. 63) is DENIED. Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief (document
nos. 34, 40, 42, and 57) are DENIED.
SIGNED this the 21 day of September, 2011.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?