Best v. Outlaw et al

Filing 4

MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 2 Report and Recommendation. The Clerk of Court is directed to file the complaint 1 as an amended complaint in Cause No. 1:07cv426. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 5/6/2010. (bjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION JASON B. BEST VS. T. C. OUTLAW, ET AL. § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-142 MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Jason B. Best, a federal prisoner previously confined in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), against T. C. Outlaw, Gerardo Maldonado, Bruce Sasser, Joyce Conley, Harley G. Lappin, and unidentified defendants. The court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Earl S. Hines, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the case without prejudice. The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties. ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Clerk of Court is directed to file the complaint (document no. 1) as an amended complaint in Cause No. 1:07-CV-426. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 6 day of May, 2010. ___________________________________ Ron Clark, United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?