Chann v. Fox et al
Filing
30
ORDER overruling plaintiff's objections and adopting the magistrate judge's 27 Report and Recommendation. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 3/28/2013. (bjc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BEAUMONT DIVISION
THY CHANN
§
VS.
§
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
§
CIVIL ACTION NO.
1:10-CV-168
ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING
THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff Thy Chann, a federal prisoner previously confined in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding
pro se, filed this civil action pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) against the United
States of America.
The Court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States
Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of
this Court. The Magistrate Judge recommends granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment
and dismissing the case with prejudice.
The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and pleadings. Plaintiff filed
objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge.
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and
the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). After careful consideration, the Court concludes the
objections are without merit.
ORDER
Accordingly, plaintiff’s objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions
of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. A final judgment will be entered in this
case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 28 day of March, 2013.
___________________________________
Ron Clark, United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?