Carl v. Cadena et al

Filing 15

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that this lawsuit be dismissed pursuant to FRCP 41(a). Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 7/21/11. (mrp, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT RICHARD ALAN CARL, Plaintiff, versus CHRISTOPHER CADENA, Defendant. EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-339 MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Richard Alan Carl, an inmate confined within the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled civil rights lawsuit. The court previously referred this matter to the Honorable Earl S. Hines, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. Plaintiff has filed a motion asking that this case be dismissed. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending the motion be granted and this lawsuit dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). The court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. No objections were filed to the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation. ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED. A final judgment will be entered dismissing this lawsuit. . SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 21st day of July, 2011. ________________________________________ MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?